Splitting a single cause of action is the act of dividing a
single or indivisible cause of action into several parts or claims and
instituting two or more actions upon them.(
Perez v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. No. 157616, July 22, 2005, 464 SCRA 89;
citing Nabus v. Court of Appeals,
G.R. No. 91670, February 7, 1991, 193 SCRA 732.) A single cause of action or
entire claim or demand cannot be split up or divided in order to be made the
subject of two or more different actions.(
Tuttle v. Everhot Heater Co., Inc., 249 N.W. 467 (1933). Thus, Section 4,
Rule 2 of the Rules of Court
expressly prohibits splitting of a single cause of action, viz:
Section 4. Splitting a
single cause of action; effect of. — If two or more suits are instituted on
the basis of the same cause of action, the filing of one or a judgment upon the
merits in any one is available as a ground for the dismissal of the others.
(4a) Catalina B. Chu et al. vs. Sps.
Fernando c. Cunanan & Trinidad N. Cunanan, G.R. No. 156185, September 12, 2011, BERSAMIN, J.:)
is the filing of two(2)separate actions for partition involving properties owned by two different persons ( from parents and from one of the sibling) constitute splitting a single cause of action?
ReplyDelete