: To recall, the Supreme Court has held in the
past that a public official’s resignation does not render moot an
administrative case that was filed prior to the official’s resignation. In Pagano
v. Nazarro, Jr., G.R. No. 149072, September 21, 2007, 533 SCRA 622,
628, the Supreme Court held that:
In Office of the Court
Administrator v. Juan [A.M.
No. P-03-1726, 22 July 2004, 434 SCRA 654, 658], this Court categorically
ruled that the precipitate resignation of a government employee charged with an
offense punishable by dismissal from the service does not render
moot the administrative case against him. Resignation is not a way out to evade administrative liability when
facing administrative sanction. The resignation of a public servant does not preclude the finding of
any administrative liability to which he or she shall still be answerable (Baquerfo v.
Sanchez, A.M. No. P-05-1974, 6 April 2005, 455 SCRA 13, 19-20 cited
in Office of the Ombudsman
vs. Uldarico P. Andutan, Jr., G.R. No. 16467, July 27, 2011, BRION, J.).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.