An amended
complaint that changes the plaintiff’s cause of action is technically a new
complaint. Consequently, the action is
deemed filed on the date of the filing
of such amended pleading, not on the date of the filing of its original
version. Thus, the statute of limitation resumes its
run until it is arrested by the filing of the amended pleading. The Court acknowledges, however, that an
amendment which does not alter the cause of action but merely supplements or
amplifies the facts previously alleged,
does not affect the reckoning date of filing based on the original
complaint. The cause of action, unchanged,
is not barred by the statute of limitations that expired after the filing of the original
complaint.( Wallem Philippines Shipping, Inc. v. S.R. Farms, Inc.,
G.R. No. 161849, July 9, 2010.) (Spouses
Vicente Dionisio at Anita Dionisio vs. Wilfredo Linsangan, G.R.
No.
178159, March 2, 2011, ABAD, J.).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.