Thursday, March 17, 2016

IN-COURT CONTEMPTS AND OUT-OF-COURT CONTEMPTS:

    A distinction between in-court contempts, which disrupt court proceedings and for which a hearing and formal presentation of evidence are dispensed with, and out-of-court contempts, which require normal adversary procedures, is drawn for the purpose of prescribing what procedures must attend the exercise of a court’s authority to deal with contempt. The distinction does not limit the ability of courts to initiate contempt prosecutions to the summary punishment of in-court contempts that interfere with the judicial process. (LORENZO SHIPPING CORPORATION VS. DISTRIBUTION BUTTON MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION OF THE PHILIPPINES [2011]).

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.