Simply stated, what distinguishes a judgment on the
pleadings from a summary judgment is the presence
of issues in the Answer to the Complaint.
When the Answer fails to tender any issue, that is, if it does not
deny the material allegations in the complaint or admits said material
allegations of the adverse party’s pleadings by admitting the truthfulness thereof
and/or omitting to deal with them at all, a judgment on the pleadings is
appropriate. On the other hand, when the
Answer specifically denies the material averments of the complaint or asserts
affirmative defenses, or in other words raises an issue, a summary
judgment is proper provided that the issue raised is not genuine.
“A ‘genuine
issue’ means an issue of fact which calls for the presentation of evidence,
as distinguished from an issue which is fictitious or contrived or which does
not constitute a genuine issue for trial.” (BASBAS VS. SAYSON [2011]).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.