The first disposes of the subject
matter in its entirety or terminates a particular proceeding or action, leaving
nothing more to be done except to enforce by execution what the court has
determined, but the latter does not completely
dispose of the case but leaves something else to be decided upon. An interlocutory
order deals with preliminary matters and the trial on the merits is yet
to be held and the judgment rendered. The test
to ascertain whether or not an order or a judgment is interlocutory or final
is: does the order or judgment leave
something to be done in the trial court with respect to the merits of the case?
If it does, the order or judgment is interlocutory; otherwise, it is final. (PAHILA-GARRIDO VS.
TORTOGO [2011]).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.