Res gestae refers to statements made by the participants
or the victims of, or the spectators to, a crime immediately before, during, or
after its commission. These statements
are a spontaneous reaction or utterance inspired by the excitement of the
occasion, without any opportunity for the declarant to fabricate a false
statement. An important consideration is
whether there intervened, between the occurrence and the statement, any
circumstance calculated to divert the mind and thus restore the mental balance
of the declarant; and afford an opportunity for deliberation . For spontaneous statements to be admitted in evidence, the following
must concur: 1) the principal act, the res gestae, is a startling occurrence;
2) the statements were made before the declarant had time to contrive or
devise; and 3) the statements concerned the occurrence in question and its
immediately attending circumstances. Here,
Fallones’ act of forcing himself into Alice is a startling event. And Amalia happened to be just outside his
house when she heard Alice cry out “tama na, tama na!” When Fallones opened the door upon Amalia’s
incessant knocking, Alice came out from behind him, uttering “Amalia,
may napkin na binigay si Romy o.”
The admissibility of Alice’s spontaneous statements rests on the valid
assumption that they were spoken under circumstances where there had been no
chance to contrive. It is difficult to lie in an excited state and the
impulsiveness of the expression is a guaranty of trustworthiness (People
vs. Fallones [2011]).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.