The mandatory character of pre-trial is embodied in
Administrative Circular No. 3-99 dated
January 15, 1999, and found its way in Section 2, Rule 18 of the Rules of
Court, which imposes a duty upon the plaintiff to promptly move ex parte
that the case be set for pre-trial.
To further show that the
Court is serious in implementing the rules on pre-trial, in Alviola
v. Avelino, A.M. No. MTJ-P-08-1697, February 29, 2008, the Supreme Court imposed the penalty
of suspension on a judge who merely failed to issue a pre-trial order within
ten (10) days after the termination of the pre-trial conference as mandated by Paragraph 8, Title I (A) of A.M. No.
03-1-09-SC. x x x It
is elementary and plain that the holding of such a pre-trial conference is
mandatory and failure to do so is inexcusable. When the law or procedure is so
elementary, such as the provisions of the Rules of Court, not to know it
or to act as if one does not know it constitutes gross ignorance of the law.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.