The accused’s confessions to the
media can be properly admitted. The confessions made in response to
questions by news reporters, not by the police or any other investigating
officer are admissible. The Supreme Court has held that statements
spontaneously made by a suspect to news reporters on a televised interview are
deemed voluntary and are admissible in evidence. Appellant argues, however,
that the questions posed to him by the radio broadcaster were vague for the
latter did not specify what crime was being referred to when he questioned
appellant. But, as the appellate court posited, appellant should have qualified
his answer during the interview if indeed there was a need. Besides, he had the
opportunity to clarify his answer to the interview during the trial. But, as
stated earlier, he opted not to take the witness stand. (People vs. Hipona [2010]).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.