JUSTICE PERALTA:

     LACHES SHOULD BE CLEARLY PRESENT FOR THE SIBONGHANOY DOCTRINE TO APPLY BECAUSE THE DOCTRINE ENUNCIATED INTIJAM VS. SIBONGHANOY IS MERELY AN EXCEPTION RATHER THAN THE RULE. (Vda. De Herrera vs. Bernardo [2011] PERALTA, J.).

https://www.facebook.com/mvplawoffice?ref=hl