Consequently, an extrajudicial confession is
binding only on the confessant, is not admissible against his or her co-accused
and is considered as hearsay against them. The reason for this rule is that: “On a principle of good faith and mutual
convenience, a man’s own acts are binding upon himself, and are evidence
against him. So are his conduct and declarations. Yet it would not only be
rightly inconvenient, but also manifestly unjust, that a man should be bound by
the acts of mere unauthorized strangers; and if a party ought not to be bound
by the acts of strangers, neither ought their acts or conduct be used as
evidence against him” (HAROLD V. TAMARGO vs. ROMULO AWINGAN, et al.
G.R. No. 177727, January 19, 2010, Third Division, Corona, J.).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.