A demurrer to evidence is filed after the
prosecution has rested its case and the trial court is required to evaluate
whether the evidence presented by the prosecution is sufficient enough to
warrant the conviction of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. If the court
finds that the evidence is not sufficient and grants the demurrer to evidence,
such dismissal of the case is one on the merits, which is equivalent to the
acquittal of the accused. Well-established is the rule that the Court cannot review an order granting
the demurrer to evidence and acquitting the accused on the ground of
insufficiency of evidence because to do so will place the accused in double
jeopardy (BENJAMIN B.. BANGAYAN, JR.
VS. SALLY GO BANGAYAN, G.R. NO. 172777, OCTOBER 19, 2011, MENDOZA, J.).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.