1) the writ of execution varies the judgment; 2) there has been a change in the situation
of the parties making execution inequitable or unjust; 3) execution is sought to be enforced against
property exempt from execution; 4) it appears that the controversy has never
been subject to the judgment of the court; 5) the terms of the judgment are not
clear enough and there remains room for interpretation thereof; or 6) it
appears that the writ of execution has been improvidently issued, or that it is
defective in substance, or is issued against the wrong party, or that the
judgment debt has been paid or otherwise satisfied, or the writ was issued
without authority. (GENERAL MILLING
CORPORATION-INDEPENDENT LABOR UNION VS. GENERAL MILLING CORPORATION, G.R.
NO. 183122, JUNE 15, 2011, PEREZ, J.).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.