Well-entrenched is the rule that resort to
handwriting experts is not mandatory. handwriting experts, while
probably useful, are not indispensable in examining or comparing handwritings
or signatures. This is so since under Section 22, Rule 132 of the Revised
Rules on Evidence, the handwriting of a person may be proved by any witness who
believes it to be the handwriting of such person, because he has seen the
person write; or has seen writing purporting to be his upon which the witness
has acted or has been charged, and has thus acquired knowledge of the
handwriting of such person. Moreover, the opinion of a non-expert
witness, for which proper basis is given, may be received in evidence regarding
the handwriting or signature of a person with which he has sufficient
familiarity. (Fullero vs. People of the
Philippines, G.R. No. 170583, September 12, 2007, Chico-Nazario, J.)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.