under Rule 133 of the Rules of Court, is not determined mathematically by the
numerical superiority of the witnesses testifying to a given fact. It depends
upon its practical effect in inducing belief for the party on the judge trying
the case. Consequently, in the hierarchy of evidentiary values, proof beyond reasonable doubt is
at the highest level, followed by clear and convincing evidence, then by
preponderance of evidence, and lastly by substantial evidence, in that order. (SIAO
ABA ET AL. VS. ATTY. SALVADOR DE GUZMAN, JR., A.C. NO. 7649,
DECEMBER 14, 2011, CARPIO, J.).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.