In the prosecution for arson, proof of the crime
charged is complete where the evidence establishes: (1) the corpus delicti, that is, a fire
because of criminal agency; and (2) the identity of the defendant as the one
responsible for the crime. In arson, the corpus delicti rule is
satisfied by proof of the bare fact of the fire and of it having been
intentionally caused. Even the uncorroborated testimony of a single eyewitness,
if credible, is enough to prove the corpus delicti and to warrant conviction. (People of the Philippines vs.
Murcia, G.R. No. 182460, March 9, 2010,
Perez, J.)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.