When an arrest is made, it is reasonable for the
arresting officer to search the person arrested in order to remove any weapon
that the latter might use in order to resist arrest or effect his escape.
Otherwise, the officer’s safety might well be endangered, and the arrest itself
frustrated. In addition, it is entirely reasonable for the arresting officer to
search for and seize any evidence on the arrestee’s person in order to prevent
its concealment or destruction. Moreover, in
lawful arrests, it becomes both the duty and the right of the
apprehending officers to conduct a warrantless search not only on the person of
the suspect, but also in the permissible area within the latter’s reach.
Otherwise stated, a valid arrest allows the seizure of evidence or dangerous
weapons either on the person of the one arrested or within the area of his
immediate control. The phrase
"within the area of his immediate control" means the area from
within which he might gain possession of a weapon or destructible evidence.
A gun on a table or in a drawer in front of one who is arrested can be as
dangerous to the arresting officer as one concealed in the clothing of the
person arrested. (VALEROSO vs. COURT OF APPEALS, G.R. No. 164815, September 3, 2009,
Third Divisio, Nachura, J.).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.