Replevin is
an action whereby the owner or person entitled to repossession of goods or
chattels may recover those goods or chattels from one who has wrongfully
distrained or taken, or who wrongfully detains such goods or chattels. It is
designed to permit one having right to possession to recover property in specie
from one who has wrongfully taken or detained the property. The term may refer either to the action itself, for the recovery of
personalty, or to the provisional remedy traditionally associated with it, by
which possession of the property may be obtained by the plaintiff and retained
during the pendency of the action. Contrary to the CA’s ratiocination, the RTC
rightfully assumed jurisdiction over the suit and acted well within its
discretion in denying Astorga’s motion to dismiss. SMART’s demand for payment
of the market value of the car or, in the alternative, the surrender of the
car, is not a labor, but a civil, dispute. It involves the relationship of
debtor and creditor rather than employee-employer relations.As such, the
dispute falls within the jurisdiction of the regular courts. (SMART
COMMUNICATIONS, INC., vs. REGINA
M. ASTORGA, G.R. No. 148132, January 28, 2008, NACHURA, J.).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.