Proof beyond reasonable doubt is the required
quantum of evidence in order to convict an accused. A judgment of conviction must rest on nothing
less than moral certainty, moral certainty in an unprejudiced mind that it was
the accused who committed the crime, failing which the accused must be exonerated.
If the prosecution failed to discharge its burden of establishing the guilt of
the accused, it unnecessary to still pass on the accused’s defense (People vs. Rubio, G.R. No. 179748, October 2, 2009, Second
Division, Carpio Morales, J.).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.