In civil cases, the
party having the burden of proof must establish his case by a preponderance of
evidence. "Preponderance of
evidence" is the weight, credit, and value of the aggregate evidence
on either side and is usually considered to be synonymous with the term
"greater weight of the evidence" or "greater weight of the
credible evidence." "Preponderance
of evidence" is a phrase which, in the last analysis, means probability of the truth. It is evidence
which is more convincing to the court as worthy of belief than that which is
offered in opposition thereto. Rule 133, Section 1 of the Rules of Court
provides the guidelines in determining
preponderance of evidence, thus:
In civil cases, the
party having the burden of proof must establish his case by a preponderance of
evidence. In determining where the preponderance or superior weight of evidence
on the issues involved lies, the court may consider all the facts and
circumstances of the case, the witnesses’ manner of testifying, their
intelligence, their means and opportunity of knowing the facts to which they
are testifying, the nature of the facts to which they testify, the probability
or improbability of their testimony, their interest or want of interest, and
also their personal credibility so far as the same may legitimately appear upon
the trial. The court may also consider the number of witnesses, though the
preponderance is not necessarily with the greater number (CAVILE
vs. LITANIA-HONG, G.R. No. 179540, March 13, 2009, Third Division,
Chico-Nazario, J.).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.