Under Article 360 of the RPC, as amended
by Republic Act No. 4363, libel cases where the complainant is a
private individual is either (1) where the complainant actually
resides at the time of the commission of the offense; or (2) where the
alleged defamatory article was printed and first published.
If the private
complainant opts for the second, the Information (formal indictment) must
specifically state where the libelous article was printed and first
published.
If the libelous
article appears on a website, there is no way of finding out the
location of its printing and first publication.
It is not enough
for the complainant to lay the venue where the article was accessed,
as this will open the floodgates to the libel suit being filed in all other
locations where the website is also accessed or capable of being accessed,
and spawn the very ills the amendment sought to prevent.
Thus, in cases where the libellous article appears on a website,
the private complainant has the option to file the case in his/her place of
residence, which will not necessitate finding out exactly where the
libelous matter was printed and first published.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.