An ejectment case is designed to restore,
through summary proceedings, the physical possession of any land or building to
one who has been illegally deprived of such possession, without prejudice to
the settlement of the parties’ opposing claims of juridical possession in
appropriate proceedings. Any ruling on
the question of ownership is only provisional and made for the sole purpose of
determining who is entitled to possession de
facto. Certainly,
a judgment in an ejectment case could only resolve the question as to who has a
better right to possess the subject property but definitely, it could not
conclusively determine whether petitioners are entitled to the award under the
ZIP or ascertain if respondents are disqualified beneficiaries.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.