It is mandatory for
the Court to take judicial notice of the official acts of the President of the
Philippines, who heads the executive branch of our government. The court shall
take judicial notice of the same without
introduction of evidence. Since the act of cancellation by President
Macapagal-Arroyo of the proposed ZTE-NBN Project during the meeting of October
2, 2007 with the Chinese President in China is considered as an official act of the executive department,
the Court must take judicial notice of such official act without need of
evidence. In David v. Macapagal-Arroyo, G.R. No. 171396, May 3, 2006, 489
SCRA 160, the Supreme Court took judicial
notice of the announcement by the Office of the President banning all rallies
and canceling all permits for public assemblies following the issuance of Presidential
Proclamation No. 1017 and General Order No. 5. In Estrada v. Desierto, G.R. No.
146710, March 2, 2001, 353 SCRA 452, the Supreme Court also resorted to
judicial notice in resolving the factual ingredient of the petition. (Sulpico vs. NEDA et. al, G.R. No. 178830,
July 14, 2008).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.