Section 3 of Rule 17 enumerates the grounds for
the quashal of a complaint or information, as follows: (a) That the facts charged
do not constitute an offense; (b)
That the court trying the case has no jurisdiction over the offense charged; (c) That the court trying the case has
no jurisdiction over the person of the accused; (d) That the officer who filed the information had no authority to
do so; (e) That it does not conform
substantially to the prescribed form; (f)
That more than one offense is charged except when a single punishment for
various offenses is prescribed by law; (g)
That the criminal action or liability has been extinguished; (h) That it contains averments which,
if true, would constitute a legal excuse or justification; and (i) That the accused
has been previously convicted or acquitted of the offense charged, or the case
against him was dismissed or otherwise terminated without his express consent (LOS
BAÑOS vs. PEDRO, G.R. No. 173588, April 22, 2009, En Banc, Brion, J.).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.