A QUESTION OF FACT IS NOT APPROPRIATE FOR A PETITION FOR REVIEW ON CERTIORARI UNDER RULE 45 OF THE RULES OF COURT:

    The parties may raise only questions of law because the Supreme Court is not a trier of facts. As a general rule, the Supreme Court is not duty-bound to analyze again and weigh the evidence introduced in and considered by the tribunals below. (NATIONAL UNION OF BANK EMPLOYEES vs. PHILNABANK EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION [2013]).

http://villasislawcenter.com/